What do I call the “rules according to which he proceeds”? [t|T]he hypothesis which describes satisfactorily his use of the words as we observe it[?|,] or the rules which he looks [j|u]p

in
as he is

using the signs, or ˇthe rule whichh he gives as an answer when we ask him what his rules are is? But what if ˇour observation does_ n[o|']t show ˇus clearly any rules, and the question doesn[n|']t

elicit one
bring any to light

? – For although he did g[i|a]ve me an explanation when I asked ˇin answer to my question, what he understood meant by “N”, he ˇbut he was prepared to

withdraw
retract

this explanation and alter it. –

So how
How then

shall I determine what the reel[s|e] are according to wh[c|i]ch he plays? [h|H]e doesn't know them himself. – Or more correctly: [W|w]hat is ˇuse is there in this case for left for the expression, “rule accordi[g|n]g to which he plays”, supposed to mean here?

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.