Here || And here we come up against the big question that lies || lying behind all these considerations || the enquiries we have been making: For || for one might object || say to me: “You take || You're taking it easy! You talk about || of all sorts of language games, but you have

Ts-226,47

¤ never said what it is that is || that's essential to || about a language game, and that means || thus to language. What it is that is || ; what's in common to all these processes || procedures and || that makes us call them language || languages, or parts of the || a language. You treat yourself to precisely || That means you now don't bother || don't bother now about that part of the enquiry, therefore, which at one time gave you the greatest puzzlement || difficulty, namely that concerning the general form of the proposition.” || and of language.”
     And that || this is true. – Instead of stating || pointing out something which is in common to all that we call language, I say there is no one thing || nothing in common to these phenomena on account in virtue of which we || that makes us use the same name || word for all of them, – they are related || akin to one another || each other in many different ways. And on account || because of this relationship, or these relationships, || kinship we call them all “languages”. I will || shall try to explain this.