Suppose that the person to whom the commands in (a) and in (b) are given has to look up in || is || has to refer to a table which || that correlates names with || in which names correspond || are correlated to pictures before he brings what is demanded || the object: Does || does he then do the same thing when he carries out a command in (a) and when he carries || carrying out a command in (a) as || and when carrying out the corresponding command in (b)? – Yes and no. You may say, || : “The || the point of the two commands is the same.” I shouldsay the same here || , in this case, say the same. But it is not || isn't always clear what one is || what's one to call || what's to be called the “point” of the || a command. (In the same way one can say of certain things that their purpose is so and so || such and such. What is essential is that that || this is a lamp, that

Ts-226,46

¤ it is || it's used for lighting, – that it decorates the room, fills an empty space, etc., is not essential. But essential and unessential are not || aren't always clearly separated.)