“But surely you won't deny that a particular command in (a) says the same as one in (b). And what are you going to || would you call the second, then, if not an analysed form || analysis of the first?” – Certainly, I should also say that a command in (a) has the same meaning as a command in (b); or, as I expressed it earlier || before, they accomplish the same. And that means: If || if someone shows me a command in (a) and asks || were to show me a command in (a) and ask || I were shown a command in (a) and asked, “Which command in (b) has the same meaning as this?”, or, again, || say: || , “Which command in (b) does this one || it contradict || has the opposite meaning?”, then I should || would answer the question in such and such a way. || should give such & such an answer. But this is not to say || does not mean that we have come to an understanding || an agreement about the use of the expression “have || having the same meaning” or “accomplish || accomplishing the same” in general. || But this is not to say that we have come to a general understanding about the use of the expression “have the same meaning” or “accomplish the same”. || But this is not to say that we now have agreed as to the use, in general, of the expressions “have the same meaning” or “accomplish the same”. For one might || may ask: In what case do we say, “those || these are only two different forms of the same game”?

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.