• Collapse

  • Annotate using Feed The Pundit
  • Ts-226 Diplomatic transcription
  • Facsimile
  • Ts-226,13[2]et14[1]
  • prev
  • next
  • Drag

  ​ 
      
27
Frege's view that in an assertion there is contain[e|s]d a supposal Annahme, and that it is this
which
that
is asserted, is based really on the possibility that there is in our language o[r|f] writing every
Ts-226,14
14
every assertion sentence in the form: “It is asserted that so and so is the case”. But “that so and so is the case” is not a sentence in our language –
this
it
is not ˇyet a move in our language game. And if I write insetad of “It is asserted that …”, ˇI write “It is asserted: so and so is the case”, then in this case the words “It is asserted” are quite superfluous.
      We might very well write every assertion in the form of a question followed by an affirmative reply; thus instead of “It's is raining”, “Is it raining? Yes.”. Would that show that in eve[er|ry] assertion there is contained a question?
 

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.




To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,13[2]et14[1]_d

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,13[2]et14[1]_d/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,13[2]et14[1]_d/json