• Collapse

  • Annotate using Feed The Pundit
  • Ts-226
  • Facsimile
  • Ts-226,2[4] Diplomatic transcription
  • prev
  • next
  • Drag

   
     
7
Imagine a way of writing || type || script in which ◇◇◇ letters are used to indicate || stand for sounds, but are used also to indicate emphasis || as accents and as marks of punctuation || punctuation signs. (One can regard a way of writing || type || script as a language for the description of sounds.) Now suppose someone understood || interpreted this || our way of writing || type || script as though it were one in which to every letter there simply corresponded a sound || all letters just stood for sounds, and as though the letters here did not have other very different functions as well || also have quite different functions. – An oversimplified view of the type like this one resembles, I believe, || Such an oversimplified view of our script is the analogon, I believe, to Augustine's view of language.

(2015–) Wittgenstein Source Bergen Nachlass Edition (WS-BNE). Edited by the Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen under the direction of Alois Pichler. In: Wittgenstein Source, curated by Alois Pichler (2009–) and Joseph Wang-Kathrein (2020–). (N) Bergen: WAB.




To cite this element you can use the following URL:


BOXVIEW: http://www.wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,2[4]_n

RDF: http://www.wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,2[4]_n/rdf

JSON: http://www.wittgensteinsource.com/BTE/Ts-226,2[4]_n/json